Rabbi Kalman Packouz relates the following story: ” Many years ago I took my wife for our anniversary to the finest restaurant (at the time) in Jerusalem, The Carvery in the King Solomon Hotel. We tremendously enjoyed the ambiance on this special occasion. My wife ordered shishkabab. When her order arrived there was one shishkabab on her plate. I asked the waiter, “Where is the other shishkabab?” He replied, “This is the way we serve it.”I asked him to please bring the menu (which was in English) and then showed him the description: “Skewers of meat roasted to perfection on our grill.” I then explained that “skewers” ends with the letter “s” indicating that the word is plural — and that the minimum plural number is two. To give added weight that there was a missing shishkabab, I directed his attention to the photograph at the top of the menu — a beautiful plate … with two skewers of shishkabab! The waiter was very gracious, but reiterated “THIS is the way we serve the dish”. I thanked him for his assistance and asked if it might be possible to have a word with the maitre d’. The maitre d’ unctuously glided over to our table and inquired how he could be of service. I once again proceeded to give my insights into the structure and grammar of the English language and the lack of congruity between what was offered on the menu and what was served on the plate. The maitre d’ gave me a compassionate look one reserves for people of lesser intelligence who don’t know what they are talking about … and informed me, “THIS is the way we serve the dish.” My wife and I thoroughly enjoyed our dinner — although in the back of my mind I was composing my letter to the Food and Beverage Manager. I wrote truthfully extolling the virtues of the restaurant — the fine decor, the excellent service, the delightful food. I then wrote, “However, there is one small matter which I know that a person of your high standards would want to know about — a seeming misrepresentation in the menu.” I then shared our experience with the shishkabab along with an explanation of the finer points of English grammar. I know that if such a situation happened in a fancy restaurant in America, it would likely have been dealt with at the waiter level with an apology and a second shishkabab. And if the situation ever reached the Food and Beverage Manager, more than likely he or she would invite the couple back for dinner, compliments of the restaurant. I wasn’t sure that the F and B manager would know this — so, I informed him — very self-servingly — of the predominant standard of expression of apology in such a situation for an elegant restaurant. He wrote back thanking me for my letter, apologizing and asking my wife and myself to please come as guests of the restaurant for dinner! Our second dinner went smoothly — until they brought the steak. I asked the waiter, “Excuse me, please, but where is the baked potato?” The waiter responded, “THIS is the way we serve the dish!” I then asked if he would mind bringing me the menu. When he brought it I pointed out the photograph of the plate with the steak … and the baked potato! He went to huddle with the maitre d’ — and then brought the potato. There are many lessons to be learned from this story: 1) Be sure to be truthful in word and deed 2) If you make a mistake, own up and make it right 3) Beware of letter writers! How does this story connect with this week’s Torah portion? Avraham wanted to purchase the Cave of Machpela for a burial place for his wife, Sarah, in Hebron. Ephron, the owner of the field with the cave, initially makes a flamboyant though ingenuous offer to give Abraham the burial site. Later, Ephron offers the field for 400 “internationally-negotiable” silver shekels worth many times more than a regular shekel. The Torah makes note of Ephron’s diminished stature by spelling his name without a letter twice after he revealed his greed and original insincerity. I sincerely believe that the restaurant did not intend to deceive. However, Ephron did intend to deceive. Some people think that the Torah is just about spirituality, but “business is business” and that the Torah does not apply to business. Not true! True spirituality is integrating the Torah into your being so that you are truthful in all of your dealings. Ultimately, the Almighty runs the world and what one gains from deception will not benefit him in the long run.”

Eliezer arrives in Charan. Rivka gives him water to drink. The Torah states: “And she finished giving him to drink. And she said, ‘Also for your camels I will draw water until they finish drinking.’ “ (Genesis 24:19) Why does the Torah specify that she will draw water rather than writing “I will give the camels to drink”? The great Spanish Rabbi, the Abarbanel, tells us that Rivkah was meticulously careful not to say anything that would be untrue. Therefore, she said she would draw water, as if to say, “I don’t know for sure if they will drink or not, but I will draw water for them. If they want to, they can drink.” Rabbi Shmuel Walkin adds that we see here how careful we should be to keep away from saying anything untrue. He cites as an example Rabbi Refael of Bershid who was always very careful to refrain from saying anything that was untrue. One day he entered his home while it was raining outside. When asked if it was still raining, he replied, “When I was outside it was raining.” He did not want to mislead in case it had stopped raining from the time he entered his home. Rabbi Zelig Pliskin explains that this may seem to be ridiculous or inconsequential. However, if a person is careful with keeping to the truth in such instances, he will definitely be careful in more important matters. On the other hand, if a person is careless with the truth, he can even be tempted to lie in major ways.

                                                                                                                                                 Prepared by Devorah Abenhaim


Share This